Data and digitalisation
Inspection data needs identity and context
A result status alone may be difficult to explain later. Traceability starts with unambiguous association.
2 min readUpdated: Editorial team: NPB NDT Consulting
Maintain component identity throughout
Define whether results belong to an individual component or an agreed batch. The identifier must remain traceable through preparation, inspection, evaluation and documentation. Repeat inspections, manual diversion or line interruptions are particular opportunities for gaps in association.
NPB NDT Consulting
Inspection data with traceable context
A result value becomes reliable evidence through its assignment.
Component identity
Component or batch ID
Unambiguous assignment
Inspection context
Instruction and program version
System and reference
Inspection data
Time and agreed data
Scope defined per project
Evaluation and roles
Result status and criteria
Responsibility and clarification steps
Digital inspection record
Link data and documents
Traceable records for quality and production.
Keep the context with the result
The record may include inspection time, system, method, program version and a link to the inspection instruction. Define the required raw data for the task. A later reader must be able to distinguish the original result, a repeat inspection and a subsequent reassessment.
Plan interfaces and data ownership together
A file export alone does not create an unambiguous exchange. Systems also need consistent interpretations of meaning, units and status values. Agree access rights, retention, backup and change handling. This provides the basis for deciding which connections to quality or production systems are actually needed.
Practical checklist
- Define component or batch association
- Link program and document versions
- Identify repeat inspections explicitly
- Agree status meanings, access and retention
Planning example
Illustrative planning example, not a customer reference.
Planning example: A component is inspected again. The second record links to the first without overwriting it. The responsible role documents which evaluation governs the next process step.
Key takeaway
Traceability depends on reliable relationships between data. A large volume of data is not, by itself, a traceable record.
Technical sources
- Fraunhofer IZFP – Digital services (external link, opens in a new tab)
- DGZfP – Data formats and interfaces (external link, opens in a new tab)
The articles and method descriptions provide general technical orientation. The organisations listed are technical sources, not customers or partners of NPB NDT Consulting. Sources may be in German or English.
These articles provide technical orientation. The specific inspection task and applicable requirements must be assessed for each project.
Would you like to apply this question to your component or process? Start by describing the task in general terms.
Related articles
Data and digitalisation
AI in NDT: define the inspection task before the model
2 min read
Automation
Retrofit: improve existing inspection systems selectively
2 min read
Inspection planning
An inspection concept starts with the right question
2 min read
