Start here
An inspection concept starts with the right question
What needs to be established about a component? Connect requirements, methods and evidence before choosing equipment.
2 min read
Read articleKnowledge
Practical articles for quality, production and engineering teams, from defining an inspection task to implementing automation.
12 articles
Start here
What needs to be established about a component? Connect requirements, methods and evidence before choosing equipment.
2 min read
Read articleInspection methods2 min read
Ultrasonic and eddy current testing address different tasks. Material, accessibility and the discontinuities of interest determine the choice.
Automation2 min read
Volume alone does not decide. Variants, material flow, clarification cases and support determine the useful scope of automation.
Automation2 min read
Stable UT needs suitable component handling, controlled coupling and a traceable response to interruptions.
Quality and evidence2 min read
Inspection extent, examined regions and detectability answer different questions. A sound concept addresses each separately.
Quality and evidence2 min read
Instrument calibration, task-specific setup and ongoing system checks serve different purposes.
Inspection planning2 min read
Acceptance activities should demonstrate whether agreed requirements are met. A successful demonstration run alone is not enough.
Data and digitalisation2 min read
A result status alone may be difficult to explain later. Traceability starts with unambiguous association.
People and organisation2 min read
A personnel certificate is important evidence of competence. A specific inspection process also needs clear operational arrangements.
Automation2 min read
Before buying new equipment, assess the existing system. The key question is which requirements it can still meet reliably.
Mechanical engineering2 min read
Castings, forgings and welded assemblies need different approaches. Early coordination helps define suitable methods and inspection stages.
Data and digitalisation2 min read
AI can support evaluation. Dependable use requires suitable data, independent assessment and clear technical responsibility.
These articles provide technical orientation. The specific inspection task and applicable requirements must be assessed for each project.
Fundamentals
This overview explains methods. Which of them are used in the project and which scope of services NPB takes on is agreed on the basis of your inspection task.
Key starting points are material, component geometry, the discontinuities sought, accessibility and the required conclusion. Production conditions and evidence requirements also play a role. Several methods often complement each other. A general ranking of the “best inspection method” therefore makes no sense.
Inspecting all components first of all describes the inspection extent. On its own, it does not state which regions of a component are covered and which discontinuities are detectable under the specific conditions. These points must be considered together in the inspection concept.
An inspection status only becomes traceable with its context. This includes component or batch identity, inspection time, the associated inspection instruction and the program version used. Which raw and result data are stored is defined to suit the inspection task, customer requirement and system concept.
NPB NDT Consulting
Inspection data with traceable context
A result value becomes reliable evidence through its assignment.
Component identity
Component or batch ID
Unambiguous assignment
Inspection context
Instruction and program version
System and reference
Inspection data
Time and agreed data
Scope defined per project
Evaluation and roles
Result status and criteria
Responsibility and clarification steps
Digital inspection record
Link data and documents
Traceable records for quality and production.
EN ISO 9712 covers the qualification and certification of NDT personnel. The evidence required in each case depends, among other things, on method, sector and task. Personal qualification does not replace system-specific familiarisation and is not a general accreditation of a company.
The articles and method descriptions provide general technical orientation. The organisations listed are technical sources, not customers or partners of NPB NDT Consulting. Sources may be in German or English.
Whether it is a new inspection concept, an automated inspection system, a system ramp-up or support for an ongoing project: describe your starting point. Together we will clarify which support fits your needs.